The Biggest Sites In Social Publishing

One way to measure how well a website is doing is by the number of pageviews it’s gotten. Another still — and the au courant metric of a website’s success — is unique visitors, because it reveals how many people are actually going there. But what if you looked at what visitors were doing with stories after reading them? That’s what Newswhip has done to compile a list of its “social monster” websites — the sites that are killing it on Facebook. And the mix might surprise you.

NBC: msnbc.com, msnbc.msn.com, nbcnews.com, nbcsports.com, nbcnewyork.com
nbclosangeles.com; ABC Network: abcnews.go.com, abc.go.com; CNN: cnn.com
money.cnn.com, fortune.cnn.com, blogs.cnn.com; Fox: foxnews.com, foxsports.com

What you’re looking at is a chart showing the publishers with the greatest number of stories that have over 100 Facebook interactions in the month of September, as measured on October 1. A “Facebook interaction” is defined as basically any kind of thing you can do with a link on Facebook — a like, a comment, or a share. The data was collected by Newswhip, which tracks over 5,000 English language newspapers and pulls the likes, shares and comments for their stories from Facebook’s open API. So, to translate, the Huffington Post had 2,531 stories last month that got at least 100 people to like, share or comment on it on Facebook.

There basically two ways you could be surprised by this chart, simply by looking at the top 10: If you have a more net-centric view of the world, it’s perhaps jarring to see that seven out of the top 10 are essentially old media properties, like the New York TimesDaily Mail and BBC (though maybe it shouldn’t be). On the other hand, it’s possibly just as surprising that theHuffington Post and BuzzFeed, sites founded in 2005 and 2006 respectively, have so quickly infiltrated the same ranks as super established properties. (And that, well, the Huffington Post carries such a commanding lead over everybody else, with nearly a third more super social stories than the runner up, the UK’s Daily Mail.)

There are obviously limitations to examining only Facebook interactions as a method for determining the most social stories and websites — it doesn’t include Twitter, Tumblr or Pinterest sharing, and it misses some of the dark social sharing proposed by Alexis Madrigal (though presumably it catchesanything shared in Facebook chat, which appears to make up a not-significant portion of dark social traffic). But of the social traffic that we can see, Facebook still makes up the single biggest chunk of it for news sites, so the data collected here is significant at least insofar as it’s telling us, broadly speaking, what people are sharing publicly — and which sites are creating more of that stuff than anybody else.

Here’s another look at that data, from a different perspective: The sites with the greatest total number of Facebook interactions. It mixes up the chart quite a bit: the New York Times moves to number three, and BuzzFeed moves to number four. The Huffington Post still destroys everybody else.

(A note and an update: Newswhip explains its data here, noting that its “content finding systems are (and will remain) a work in progress,” leading to it not counting Slate‘s blogs, which led to a lower ranking for the site. The Daily Beastdisputs its Newswhip rank, which was below the top 40. Another particular point is that the Wall Street Journal and other sites behind a paywall present challenges to accurate tracking.

The tool that generated this data, Newswhip’s Spike is in open beta right now and free.

[Source: BuzzFeed]

Economist sees print dead in 25 years, Flipboard as rival

Most print publishing will be gone within the next 25 years, The Economist CEO Andrew Rashbass predicted in a presentation on Thursday. Paper magazines were at new highs, and his publication was hoping to keep demand hihg, but he told paidContent and others at Madrid’s Paley Center international council that he was realistic about print going away. He was enthusiastic about tablet reading, which gave the company a possible avenue for a business model after years of uncertainty over a pure web version.

It’s not fashionable to say it, but I think, frankly, it will be all digital,” Rathbass said. “I don’t know when that will be exactly, but the idea that mass printing of paper will be around in 25 years is odd.”

However, he saw direct competition from news curation apps like Flipboard. These apps gave someone else revenue that ought to belong to the original publication, Rashbass said. The issue wasn’t serious, but Rashbass wouldn’t have volunteered to optimize The Economist for Flipboard even if he had been asked.

Unlike with competitors such as the Financial Times, Rashbass wasn’t upset about Apple’s 30 percent cut on iPad magazines sold through the App Store. Third-party distribution costs were a regular part of the industry, he said.

viaEconomist sees print dead in 25 years, Flipboard as rival.